Instructor

Peter L. Knepell

Dr Pete Knepell is president of Peak Quality Services in Colorado Springs, CO. Since 1988 he has trained thousands of professionals in quality systems and quality improvement methodologies. His past clients include: several defence agencies, the Canadian Red Cross, Sony, Corning, Texas Instruments, Xerox, Hewlett Packard, Heritage Valley Health System, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, GE Healthcare, Roche Diagnostics, Creation Technologies, SORB Technology, Baxter, Medtronic, Stryker, Zimmer, Varian, Ventana Medical Systems, Johnson & Johnson, and Siemens Healthineers.

He helps his clients apply innovative methods and technologies to enhance process quality improvement. These include process validation, risk management, statistical process improvement, software quality improvement, and Lean Six Sigma. For example, Pete directed a team that developed a Continuous Process Validation system for a large pharmaceutical firm. This system integrated a database with a graphical user interface (GUI) and a sophisticated statistical package. It was a validated system that meets FDA regulatory requirements. It was used to display and analyse historical and real-time data to monitor and improve product quality.

Related courses to Peter L. Knepell

What is Process Capability and How to Measure It?

Get a simple flow chart on methods to establish and maintain product and process capability through meaningful measures of quality.
Online
Process capability, Quality measures

Valid Statistical Techniques Made Easy Part 2

This training is covers the application of valid statistical methods and tools to satisfy the requirements of the FDA:s QSR and ISO 13485:2016.
On demand
Statistics, Validation

Valid Statistical Techniques Made Easy Part 1

This training is covers the application of valid statistical methods and tools to satisfy the requirements of the FDA:s QSR and ISO 13485:2016.
On demand training
Statistics

Sampling – Medical Devices

How Much Is Enough for Process Validation? This training will cover the details of application without the burden of statistical complexity.
On demand
Process validation, Sampling, Statistics

Validation of Analytical Procedures Made Easy

What parameters are key to quality? How do we quickly and efficiently identify these parameters and decide on strategies to optimize quality? This webinar is focused on a “Faster, Better, Cheaper” methodology. Targeted to medical device and pharmaceutical professionals involved in meeting Design Control and Process Validation.
Mar 4
Online
Design Control, Statistics, Validation and Qualification

Are Your Data Normal or Not?

What is “Normal” data? How do you know if your data are Normal? What do you do if your data are not Normal? Why would you care?
Online
Statistics

Design of Experiments – DOE

What parameters are key to quality? How do we quickly and efficiently identify these parameters and decide on strategies to optimize quality?
May 25
Online
Design Control, Statistics, Validation and Qualification

Statistical Techniques for Process Validation Made Easy – Part 2

Learn how valid statistical techniques contribute to Process Validation efforts. Best practices for quality systems in industry.
Dec 11
Online
Statistics, Validation and Qualification

Statistical Techniques for Process Validation Made Easy – Part 1

Learn how valid statistical techniques contribute to Process Validation efforts. Best practices for quality systems in industry.
Dec 10
Online
Statistics, Validation and Qualification

Sampling: How Much Is Enough?

This fast-paced webinar will cover the details of application of Sampling without the burden of statistical complexity.
Online
Statistics, Validation and Qualification

FMEA Without Tears

This webinar provides a process to conduct FMEA and assess risk in an efficient way where everyone can agree on the results.
Jan 20
Online
Risk

Test Method Validation (TMV) Made Easy – Part 2 Attribute Measurements

This second webinar will focus on Attribute Measurement Systems – that is, the subjective inspection of items to see if they satisfy requirements. Since humans are the “gauges”, attribute measurement systems can have high variation. How do you evaluate this human judgement and how can you improve their results? And how is it “made easy”?
Feb 25
Online
Statistics, Validation and Qualification

Search

Search